NC Fathers Rights

Rosie Batty, Australian Women and Children Advocate on Domestic Violence Shows How The Family Court Is Both Flawed and Ruled By Feminist

Feminism and family courtsRosie Batty is an Australian women and children’s advocate speaking out about domestic violence and family violence and how the family courts are flawed and hurt single mothers. Not surprisingly, she also speaks and writes and uses social media top talk about how family violence hurts women and children and has quite an impressive social media following. For a lot of readers of this article, what we have written thus far will likely garner a great deal of support for Rosie Batty and her efforts on domestic and family violence. Furthermore, we suspect that most women and even some men will champion her efforts and that most feminist will applaud her attention to women’s and children’s issues in the areas of violence. In our research on Ms. Batty, we found nothing to indicate that she is a practicing feminist, but we do see an awful lot of narratives that professional feminist organizations use when talking about the family courts and domestic violence.

So what is the problem and why are we drawing attention to her and her efforts to end violence?

First, in looking at a recent article written about her at the Huffington Post (A far left wing feminist organization who gains millions of dollars a year in writing articles on social issues with a social justice warrior slant to gain high traffic for advertising revenue) entitled “Rosie Batty Says Men Who Have Never Hit Women Can Still Be Dangerous“, we noted that Ms. Batty is attempting to say that all men are dangerous, even if they do not hit.

Within the article, there is an extreme amount of sexist narrative that unfolds that reads right out of the radical feminist playbook which seeks to stigmatize all men and boys so that professional feminist can then have an issue to talk about, write books on, get money from governments on to do research, deliver $20,000 speeches on, start non-profits that profit employees, and to build lobby groups for political clout.

Let’s take a look at a few examples from the article about Rosie Batty:

“But on Wednesday, domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty used the opportunity to address all men instead of just politicians.

She did this before even speaking, sharing the stage with Men’s Behavior Change counselor Danny Blay.”

In any research, article, or report when you see the words “All men” or “All women” you should realize that you are dealing with someone who has an agenda, be it political, financial, or attention”

And here we start to see the political and financial efforts being realized:

“The Coalition has promised $30 million for family violence legal centers while the New South Wales government announced $300 million to tackle the problem, putting GPS detectors on perpetrators and investing $8 million in men’s behavior change programs.”

“This debate should be above politics. It’s about putting the safety, well-being and essential needs of children above all else. It is about keeping our kids safe from violence and terror,” Batty said.

Reviews on Rosie Batty as a women and children's advocate in the Australian family law system

According to this article, we are asked to believe the following:

  • That all men are dangerous even if they do not hit, that men who are mentally and psychologically abusive are MORE dangerous.
  • That men are the only domestic batterers, and that men are the only mental and psychological abusers because of toxic masculinity (a new feminist buzzword).
  • That the Australian government should recognize Rosie Batty as the most revered women and children’s advocate in the county and start spending millions of dollars per year on changing men’s behaviors.
  • That the family courts should have a mandate that follows this narrative when dealing with families withing the family law system.
  • That female batterers and women who commit mental and psychological abuse are always operating within an environment where a male is actually controlling her and thus her abuse is a symptom of toxic masculinity.

Basically, what we have here is a feminist’s dream family law system with Rosie Batty at the helm demanding that judges view domestic violence and family violence as a all male perpetrator/woman victim system, that to keep children safe, children should have little interaction with their fathers if any, that government should funnel money from government programs to support women and children only, and when we do see female family violence and domestic violence we are likely see a symptom of male control and oppression.

There was no word in the articles at the Huffington Post on how Rosie Batty explains female domestic violence on children when the father isn’t even known, or when domestic violence occurs in lesbian marriages or intimate partnership situations. We suspect that the feminist tried and true declaration that the invisible patriarchy is involved when two women commit violence, or when a mother commits violence on her child when a toxic male isn’t in the picture.

With modern feminism, it is always going to boil down to it being a man’s fault. Feminism and women and children’s advocates within the family law system and courts have done a great job over 80 years of framing all violence as a men’s issues and that after divorce systems setup to only benefit women and children.

As with most articles we write on this issue, this is where we usually link to millions upon millions of Internet articles of women killing husbands and boyfriends, their own children, other women, and whatnot. The problem here is that the professional feminist lobby has an interest in this only being defined as a male problem and will use buzzwords like “The patriarchy”, “toxic masculinity” and “male privilege” so that we can assign female violence as a symptom of the male problems.

What is the bottom line?

If you are a male not ingrained in the new modern radical feminist movement, or use this issue for political reasons, you are probably calling bullshit. But calling this bullshit isn’t going to cut it since the radical feminist movement and advocates for women and children like Rosie Batty have successfully lobbied governments, lawyers associations, judicial associations, and the domestic violence industry to implement these policies.

And quit frankly men deserve the raw deal they are getting in the family courts not because of toxic masculinity or that they are nature born abusers, but because for going on 80 years men have had their thumb up their asses not forming their own advocacy groups and affecting politics in the same way as the angry feminist.

But there is another groups that I think Rosie Batty is highly disrespectful to, and that is women who have sons. Essentially, what this advocate is saying is that the little child you hold in your hands today is going to become toxic and will abuse, and from that he and YOU should have little contact with that child should a divorce happen.

So much for equality with feminist huh?

As a feminist who is truly about equality among the genders and has no interest in gender warfare and has interest in actually stopping all domestic violence and family violence in Australia or here in the United States, what are your thoughts on Rosie Batty and her advocate status?

As a everyday women with sons, what are your thoughts on radical feminist attempting to stigmatize your sons as future domestic batters and psychological abusers who should have little access to their children (and you by proxy)? Using the comment section below, what do you have to say to Rosie Batty?

Learn more about Fathers rights in Australia or visit the author on Twitter.

Tags: Rosie Batty, Domestic Violence, Australian Family Courts


June 16, 2016 - Posted by | Uncategorized


  1. As a woman, this really angers me. I consider myself as egalitarian feminist which has the belief that regardless of gender we should see equality. Saying that only men are dangerous and domestic violence perpetrators and that when women are violent it is because of men, that immediately screams gender warfare, inequality, and agenda.

    For gender feminist, those who believe they are furthering feminist causes by degrading men and boys, there is usually some professional gain. You brought up political and financial, but there are others. There could simply be a personal hatred of men, there could be a gender feminist that wants to write a paper to get a grant and needs information like this in her paper to solicit for money. Or, she wants to write a book on domestic violence that is one sided to draw in funds for a non-profit. Or, she just wants to see women and children benefit after a divorce while a father is pushes to the wayside so that women can get in to the welfare system and away from a man.

    This is the feminism that is hurting the original intent of this movement. Where this Rosie Batty is on this spectrum I don’t know, but it sounds like she is a women’s and children’s advocate at the demise of fathers and men which has only succeeded in starting a huge men’s movement with many females in their family joining the cause, and with egalitarian feminist joining the cause.

    After a divorce, the family law system should advocate for the child first, then both parents, not just a mother. This is basic inequality and not something feminism stands for. This is why I do not that that Rosie Batty is a feminist unless a RadFem and is just a self appointed women and children advocate for a personal, political, or financial agenda using the emotional issue of domestic violence.

    There is tons of information out there by neutral organizations showing that yes women commit domestic violence and family violence, that it happens with gay men and lesbian women.


    Comment by Amanda | June 16, 2016 | Reply

  2. I saw your tweet and had to reply. I am a paternal grandmother and can tell you in Australia fathers have very little rights to children after a divorce even compared to the United States, but there is a big push over here to straighten this out and I believe Rosie Batty if the go to in an effort to use political correctness, her position as a women who uses the victim card, and the emotional of family violence to create and maintain strict anti-father policies in the courts here.

    This hyper rhetoric of only men are bad and women are good, and only men hurt children in marriages and relationships is crap. I hope that fathers and men, along with women in their families will start standing up to those elected to stop this insanity.

    I have done some research on Rosie Batty and am somewhat sympathetic to her. Her husband never beat her, but he did kill their son. This is enough to make a women very bitter and angry for sure, but instead of dealing with this in therapy, it seems she has a vendetta for men and fathers.


    Comment by Crystal | June 16, 2016 | Reply

  3. professional feminist who make a living off women’s issues know that domestic violence statistics being skewed towards men bring their organizations a lot of government money and resources, along with sympathy. Feminist have no desire for the word to get out that women hit, cause psychological and mental abuse with husbands and children because it would mess up everything. It’s almost like the professional feminist enjoy having domestic violence around so they can USE it for politics, fund raising, and building organizations.

    I read the article at the Huffington Post but there are others with a LOT more salacious material. This Rosie Batty is no women and children advocate for the courts, she is an out and out radical feminist or radical man hater.


    Comment by John | June 16, 2016 | Reply

  4. I’m in that exact situation CPS came and took my child I asked him what I was being charged with they do not know the own call social worker made up total lies.I’ve even got people stating that she is lying she took my child for no good reason when I told my child don’t worry I’m going to do everything to get you home soon I was told not to tell him that I did not know he was coming home they are doing everything in the world to keep my child from me giving me unreasonable expectations but I asked her to record the conversations which is my legal right because I know they’re making these things up I was told I was not allowed to I have been left out of everything they cut off all food stamps Medicaid and then filing for child support and we haven’t even been to court yet I know they are trying to keep my child the things they’ve made up I’m just looking at this going I know this cannot be real this has to be stopped it is happening all over the country thousands of people have websites and Facebook pages talking about the exact same thing how is this continue to go on we as parents need to come together and put a stop to this this is horrible how they’re using these kids and tearing them away from their parents for money.


    Comment by Mamma T | January 30, 2017 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: